1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. 2618 Aluminum vs. 7075 Aluminum

2618 Aluminum vs. 7075 Aluminum

Jan. 20, 2025

Both alloys are very strong, with 7075 aluminum typically being more widely used in structural applications, while 2618 aluminum is generally used in high-temperature environments.

Both 2618 and 7075 aluminum alloys are high-performance materials used in demanding applications like aerospace and automotive industries. While they share similarities, their unique properties make them suitable for different uses.

  • 2618 aluminum is particularly suited for high-temperature, high-performance applications, where toughness and the ability to handle thermal stresses are crucial. It is commonly used in parts exposed to extreme heat environments, such as engine components and high-temperature aerospace structures.
  • 7075 aluminum is favored for its excellent strength-to-weight ratio and high fatigue resistance, making it an ideal choice for structural components in industries where strength and durability are essential, such as aerospace and aviation.

Both alloys are invaluable, but the choice between them largely depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as the need for heat resistance, strength, machinability, and overall performance under stress.

Comparison Between 2618 Aluminum Alloy and 7075 Aluminum Alloy

Properties 2618 Aluminum Alloy 7075 Aluminum Alloy
Tensile Strength Lower, but suitable for high-strength parts Higher, suitable for high-strength structural applications
Elongation Higher, with good formability Lower, suitable for high-strength parts
Fatigue Strength Higher, suitable for fatigue-resistant applications Broader range, suitable for working under repeated stress conditions
Shear Strength Higher, suitable for applications subjected to shear forces Higher, suitable for applications with high shear forces
Maximum Working Temperature Higher, suitable for high-temperature environments Lower, suitable for medium to low-temperature working environments
Thermal Conductivity Higher, suitable for applications requiring heat management Lower, affecting stability at high temperatures
Melting Point Higher, suitable for high-temperature processing Higher, suitable for high-temperature processing
Electrical Conductivity Higher, suitable for conductive applications Lower, suitable for applications with lower conductivity
Density Lower, suitable for lightweight designs Higher, suitable for applications where weight is not critical
Cost Similar, possibly cheaper More expensive, due to widespread use and higher strength
Main Components Higher copper and nickel content, suitable for high-temperature performance Higher zinc content, providing excellent strength and fatigue resistance
Main Applications High-temperature, high-strength parts, engine components, racing, etc. High-strength structural parts, aerospace, military, etc.
  • 2618 aluminum alloy is suitable for high-temperature, high-strength parts, particularly ideal for applications requiring heat resistance and fatigue endurance, such as engine components and racing.
  • 7075 aluminum alloy is primarily used for high-strength, fatigue-resistant applications, widely used in aerospace and military fields.

2618 Aluminum vs. 7075 Aluminum Mechanical Properties

Property 2618 Aluminum 7075 Aluminum
Elastic Modulus (GPa) 71 70
Elongation at Break (%) 5.8 1.8 to 12
Fatigue Strength (MPa) 110 110 to 190
Poisson's Ratio 0.33 0.32
Shear Modulus (GPa) 27 26
Shear Strength (MPa) 260 150 to 340
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (MPa) 420 240 to 590
Tensile Strength: Yield (MPa) 350 120 to 510

2618 Aluminum vs. 7075 Aluminum Thermal Properties

Property 2618 Aluminum 7075 Aluminum
Latent Heat of Fusion (J/g) 390 380
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical (°C) 210 200
Melting Completion (Liquidus) (°C) 640 640
Melting Onset (Solidus) (°C) 550 480
Specific Heat Capacity (J/kg-K) 880 870
Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) 160 130
Thermal Expansion (µm/m-K) 22 23

2618 Aluminum vs. 7075 Aluminum Electrical Properties

Property 2618 Aluminum 7075 Aluminum
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume (% IACS) 37 33
Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (% IACS) 110 98

2618 Aluminum vs. 7075 Aluminum Alloy Composition

Element 2618 Aluminum 7075 Aluminum
Aluminum (Al) (%) 92.4 to 94.9 86.9 to 91.4
Chromium (Cr) (%) 0 0.18 to 0.28
Copper (Cu) (%) 1.9 to 2.7 1.2 to 2.0
Iron (Fe) (%) 0.9 to 1.3 0 to 0.5
Magnesium (Mg) (%) 1.3 to 1.8 2.1 to 2.9
Manganese (Mn) (%) 0 0 to 0.3
Nickel (Ni) (%) 0.9 to 1.2 0
Silicon (Si) (%) 0.1 to 0.25 0 to 0.4
Titanium (Ti) (%) 0.040 to 0.1 0 to 0.2
Zinc (Zn) (%) 0 to 0.1 5.1 to 6.1
Zirconium (Zr) (%) 0 0 to 0.25
Residuals (%) 0 0 to 0.15

Products you may be interested in

Recommended Content

CONTACT US

Please feel free to write down your requirement in the form below. We will reply you within 24 hours and we will protect your personal privacy information.

We will strictly protect your data and information security